Keep and Share logo     Log In  |  Mobile View  |  Help  
 
Visiting
 
Select a Color
   
 
UKMFA -​ Informed Consent - Letter from Doctor to GMC

UKMFA -​ Informed Consent - Open Letter to GMC Chair, Dame Clare Marx, from Dr Sarah Myhill (GP)
Consent for doctors to administer and patients to receive CV19 vaccination   27 November 2020

 

Dear Dame Marx 
Doctors are administering vaccines to patients without proper consent. Such is based on GMC


Guidelines. The GMC is misleading doctors and patients.

This makes the GMC jointly responsible for any harm resulting from CV19 vaccinations.
Proper consent for doctors to administer and patients to receive vaccination
Ref – The GMC Green Book “Immunisation against Infectious Disease”
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/immunisation-against-infectious-disease-the-greenbook
Ref - General Medical Council “Ethical guidance for doctors: Decision making and consent 2020”
https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/decision-making-andconsent)
I am concerned that the GMC Green Book and 2020 GMC Guidance for decision making and consent
fails to properly address informed consent. Both are misleading to doctors and patients.
If GMC Guidance for informed consent for patients is inadequate and does not properly reflect the
Montgomery Judgement, then the GMC will be jointly legally responsible for damages when doctors
have not given proper consent to vaccination because they have been misled by GMC Guidance.
The GMC Green Book “Immunisation against Infectious Disease” is hopelessly out-dated
The Green Book is hopelessly out of date (2013) and does not reflect the Montgomery Judgement in
any way. By letting this publication stand, the GMC is mis-leading doctors and patients.
Before Montgomery, a doctor's duty to warn patients of risks was based on whether they
had acted in line with a responsible body of medical opinion. This was known as the Bolam
test. Now, doctors must provide information about all material risks; they must disclose any
risk to which a reasonable person in the patient's position would attach significance.
The Green Book is based on Bolam NOT Montgomery. It does not address “all material risks”
nor “any risk to which a reasonable person in the patient's position would attach significance.”
The 2020 Guidance is improved but still inadequate


Many doctors will be relying on GMC Guidance for informed consent for administering vaccinations
to patients. This is reasonable. Busy doctors simply do not have the time or resources to obtain
independent legal advice with respect to the above issues. They can reasonably expect GMC
Guidance to properly reflect all aspects of their legal obligations to patients. Those doctors who fail
to address the issues of proper informed consent will be found wanting under the 2017
Montgomery Judgement, if they fail to correctly consent patients receiving any vaccination including
CV19 vaccine.
The 2020 update was clearly drawn up in response to the Montgomery Judgement of 2017, but that
too is inadequate because it only part-reflects Montgomery. This is because an important part of the
Montgomery Judgement has been over-looked vis:
“The doctor is therefore under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is
aware of ………. any reasonable alternative or variant treatments.”
[ https://www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/guides/montgomery-and-informedconsent ]
This directive is a MUST (i.e. it is legally binding) and it is NOT reflected in the extant 2020 GMC
Guidance.
Please can you update the GMC Guidance to include the need for doctors to advise patients of “any
reasonable alternative or variant treatments “ AND transpose ALL the changes above into the
“Green Book”. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/immunisation-against-infectiousdisease-the-green-book
What the GMC must do now, urgently
Current versions of the Green Book must be withdrawn at once because it is misleading. The 2020
Guidelines must also be updated. THEN doctors and patients must be informed urgently in a highprofile publicity campaign.
Clearly this needs doing as a matter of urgency to protect all doctors and all patients since the CV19
vaccine program is being rolled out at such short notice. The GMC has been notoriously tardy in
responding to my concerns so I shall be writing to the BMA to highlight this issue and placing this as
an Open Letter in the public arena
The GMC ‘s slogan is “Supporting doctors, protecting patients”. With respect to the above the GMC
is doing neither.
Yours sincerely
Dr Sarah Myhill
Independent Medical Practitioner GMC number 2734668
(Sent by email to claremarx@gmc-uk.org on 27 November 2020)


Creation date: Oct 1, 2021 9:29pm     Last modified date: Oct 1, 2021 9:53pm   Last visit date: Nov 26, 2024 5:53pm
    Report Objectionable Content