This image from the Zapruder film shows Jackie Kennedy on the rear deck of the presidential limousine. When I first viewed the Zapruder film, I assumed that she had climbed out of the rear seat and onto the deck to assist Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who had run to the limo from the car following it, and who was climbing aboard. That's actually not the case, though. Jackie had actually climbed onto the deck to retrieve a mass of brain matter which she later handed to doctors at the Parkiew Hospital. According to Clint Hill, here's what he saw as he approached the limo: "Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound … Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her. … I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face-- his head was in her lap. The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound."
This image from the Zapruder film shows Jackie Kennedy on the rear deck of the presidential limousine. When I first viewed the Zapruder film, I assumed that she had climbed out of the rear seat and onto the deck to assist Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who had run to the limo from the car following it, and who was climbing aboard. That's actually not the case, though. Jackie had actually climbed onto the deck to retrieve a mass of brain matter which she later handed to doctors at the Parkiew Hospital. According to Clint Hill, here's what he saw as he approached the limo: "Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound … Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her. … I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face-- his head was in her lap. The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound."
Zapruder film frames 312 and 313 showing the "kill shot."
Note that I have labeled the lines A through G. Since the frame counter always remains in a stable position throughout the film, I used this as a reference point to align the two frames using line E. Now look at frame 312 and you will see that line B is directly against the back of Kennedy's head, but in frame 313 his head has moved slightly forward while at the same time it appears that he has suffered a massive blowout wound at the front of his face. The most far reaching blowout area would seem to be the upper right area of his forehead, although his entire face appears to be erupting, from his forehead to his chin. Strange, isn't it? Strange too that Jackie's face and hair was not doused in blood from this violent outburst. Or was this, in fact, a false depiction? In other words, is this an altered film? Let's see what we can see.First, notice that frame 312 is in relatively good focus, but frame 313 is not nearly as clear. If Kennedy is in fact moving suddenly forward then wemight conclude that he probably would be blurred somewhat, but what about Jackie? Note that her right elbow remains aligned with line A, and that her hat and left shoulder appear to remain aligned with lines D and C, respectively. So why is Jackie now a complete blur? And why is the top of the seat back blurred? For that matter, considerably more important is the fact that the shape of the back and upper rear portions of Kennedy's head are not maintained in this slight forward move. Has he in fact moved forward at all, or is this simply what viewers are led to believe? If one analyzes the film frame-by-frame it becomes quite apparent that at each point in the film where something of significance seems to have happened, the corresponding frame is either blurred or defaced by multiple defects.The original Zapruder film was shot in color at about 18 frames per second, and thus only 5.5/100ths of a second has elapsed from frame 312 to frame 313. That's hardly enough time for lighting conditions to have changed substantially, and the blur in 313 can not reasonably be assumed to have been an instantaneous hand movement reaction by Mr Zapruder to the kill shot. So the question then becomes, what is really going on?First of all, the Zapruder film has been reproduced in many different forms over the years, in an effort to supposedly enhance the viewing experience. The frames above were taken from the latest "high definition" YouTube video. We can also find what is said to be the unenhanced, unaltered, and "undamaged" version of the film, but it is a sure bet that even that version cannot be trusted as being an accurate depiction of the assassination. Researchers have proven that the so-called Zapruder film is not the original one that Zapruder filmed with his camera, but instead is a manufactured fiction. A Zapruder film symposium was held at the University of Minnesota in May of 2003, and several film experts pointed out in great detail why the Zapruder film that we have been shown is a hoax. A series of 10 minute videos made at the symposium has been posted at YouTube by John Costas to inform people as to the specifics of the hoax. As Costas himself points out, a series of frames is missing near the beginning, and Zapruder stated that he never stopped filming once he had started. Also, Costas points out that as the limo proceeds down the street, before the neck shot is fired, the people standing on the left sidewalk are motionless! And the background images beyond the limo's left side have been altered to change the reality of the situation. Two persons who say that they actually viewed the Zapruder film, uncut and as originally filmed (but at different times), both say that the limo actually came to a full stop for about two seconds, and that it was at this time that two shots hit Kennedy in the head. One of these men is Rich DellaRosa and the other is French journalist William Reymond. Reymond is also interviewed by Jim Marrs in this video. According to DellaRosa, he saw the unaltered film at a university before the first public airing on TV, which was during the Geraldo Rivera Show in 1975. When DellaRosa saw the Rivera show film, he immediately recognized that what was being shown on TV was entirely different from what he had seen earlier. It is unknown where the copy shown at the university came from, or what later became of it. Zapruder had asked the film processor to make 3 copies of the original, and to sign an affidavit stating that no further copies were to be made at that time, but that of course does not rule out the possibility that the duplication employee did make an extra copy or two. The temptation to do so would have been practically irresistible. The copy which Reymond saw is said to have been shown to him by a French intelligence officer, and was copied from a film said to have been purchased directly from Zapruder, on the day of the assassination, by Texas billionaire oilman Howard L Hunt. Zapruder said that he gave two of the first generation copies to Forrest Sorrels of the Secret Service on November 22nd, and one of these was sent to the FBI in Washington the next day while the other found its way to the CIA's National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC) the evening of the assassination day. The NPIC was a state of the art photograpic facility which had processing machines that other facilities only dreamed of in 1963, and could easily have produced the altered version of the Zapruder film within a few hours. It is said that Zapruder retained the original film plus one first gen copy, though Zapruder may well have had additional first generation copies made of the original afterwards and sold some of these. One copy was handed to Life Magazine's Dick Stolley on November 23, and that was given back to the Zapruder family in the 1970's. That one is said to have been extensively damaged when the Life technicians destroyed several frames. Life had paid Zapruder $150,000 for rights to use the images, and had published black and white frame images in one of their magazine issues. There is no way that Zapruder would have parted with the original film, and obviously he would also have retained a backup first gen copy, and the ARRB report indicated that the Zapruder family did possess an extra copy. In summary, we can safely say that the Zapruder film shown to the public in 1975 on the Rivera show was a manufactured hoax, and that all other films and videos made from that altered version cannot be trusted either. While the reworked Zapruder film is no doubt the most well known one taken on the day of the assassination, there were in fact several others taken that day, as well as many relevant still photos. Since all of these were considered "official assassination records," they were of course handled and examined by the FBI and CIA at some point soon after being filmed. It is notable that the ones of most importance have missing or damaged frames at the major intervals of interest. That's too strange to be mere coincidence.
Is "R" JFK JR?
This anonymous post showed up at the QAnon message boards on June 23, 2018. If one takes all that is stated in the post as being factual then it would appear that the post was made by JFK Jr, and many still believe that is the case. That, of course, would indicate that JFK JR lives, and only faked his death for 19 years as a means to remain alive. The full text of the post, and further follow-up discussion, can be seen at this link: http://qanon.news/Archives/x/2216485
Post by QAnon concerning JFK JR
This post by QAnon is intriguing as it mentions "POTUS & JFK JR" and then "Relationship." It is well known that Donald Trump and JFK JR were close friends, and since everyone on the Q message boards already understands that DJT refers to Donald J Trump, why didn't Q say "DJT & JFK JR" instead of using "POTUS?" The use of "POTUS" only seems to make sense if Q is saying that the relationship is a current one, rather than in the past, and would of course mean that JFK JR is alive.
John F Kennedy Jr wrote these words
JFK JR wrote these words in his GEORGE magazine one month before news sources reported that he had died in a plane crash. What if he actually faked his death, after learning of a plot to kill him, as a means of staying alive until it would be safe for him to publicly reappear? If he were alive today, and many believe that to be the case, it seems that he would be a fervent Trump supporter. It would also seem that if Trump is seen as successful at draining the Washington DC "swamp" of its criminal elite, the time would be right for JFK to reappear.
Is this man, who some call Vincent Fusca, actually JFK JR?
This photo was captured from video of a West Virginia Trump rally held on August 21, 2018, just after President Trump finished his speech and was walking along the front row of spectators who had been seated behind him. Many people believe that the man at left, wearing the black hat and rounded eyeglasses, is actually JFK JR. This man has appeared at several Trump rallies, always wearing the same outfit. A facial overlay comparison to a JFK JR photo, which also appears in this folder, shows a remarkable similarity.
A facial overlay photo comparison
This facial overlay was done by partially overlaying a photo of JFK JR with an image of a man's face, wearing rounded spectacles and a black fedora hat, taken at a Trump rally in Pittsburgh. Considering the fact that 19 years had passed between the dates these 2 photos were taken, the alignment and similarity of facial features is remarkable. Although the hairline at left side is considerably lower, this would be caused by the hat being worn which is pushing the hair downward on the man's forehead.
These grave sites, viewed together, form a prominent Q
Is this why the Q Anon movement chose the letter Q as their symbol and signature?
"WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL" is the inscription seen on this bell from JFK JR's boat.
This is also the meaning of the acronym WWG1WGA, which has been used several times in Q posts, and which was also used at the end of an anonymous post on the Q research site (No 1879763) on June 23, 2018, by someone claiming to be JFK JR.
This image from the Zapruder film shows Jackie Kennedy on the rear deck of the presidential limousine. When I first viewed the Zapruder film, I assumed that she had climbed out of the rear seat and onto the deck to assist Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who had run to the limo from the car following it, and who was climbing aboard. That's actually not the case, though. Jackie had actually climbed onto the deck to retrieve a mass of brain matter which she later handed to doctors at the Parkiew Hospital. According to Clint Hill, here's what he saw as he approached the limo: "Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound … Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her. … I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face-- his head was in her lap. The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound."
This image from the Zapruder film shows Jackie Kennedy on the rear deck of the presidential limousine. When I first viewed the Zapruder film, I assumed that she had climbed out of the rear seat and onto the deck to assist Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who had run to the limo from the car following it, and who was climbing aboard. That's actually not the case, though. Jackie had actually climbed onto the deck to retrieve a mass of brain matter which she later handed to doctors at the Parkiew Hospital. According to Clint Hill, here's what he saw as he approached the limo: "Brain matter, blood, bone fragments all come out of the wound … Then Mrs. Kennedy came up on the trunk. She was trying to grab some of that material and pull it back with her. … I got a hold of her and I put her in the backseat. … And when I did that, his body fell to its left into her lap. His face-- his head was in her lap. The right side of his face was up. I could see his eyes were fixed. I could see an area through the skull that there was no brain matter in that area at all. So I assumed it was a fatal wound."